Free · No sign-up · Runs in your browser

Software Development Cost Calculator

Scope your project in a minute and get an indicative cost range, timeline, recommended team, and risk profile — based on how we actually estimate 1200+ delivered projects.

Project type
Platform
Features
User roles
Third-party integrations
AI features
Admin portal
Timeline
Team size
UI complexity

Estimated cost range

$47k$71k

1,553 engineering hours at a blended offshore-led rate

Timeline

12 weeks

2.8 months

Risk level

Low

0 risk factors identified

Cost breakdown by phase

View as table
PhaseShareCost range
Discovery & planning8%$3,800$5,700
UX / UI design12%$5,600$8,500
Development52%$24,400$36,900
Testing & QA18%$8,500$12,800
Launch & stabilization10%$4,700$7,100

Delivery timeline

Recommended team

  • Project manager

    Part-time; your single point of contact

    ×1
  • UX/UI designer

    Front-loaded in design phase

    ×1
  • Software engineers

    Full-stack

    ×3
  • QA engineer

    Dedicated

    ×1

Risk factors

No elevated risk factors for this scope — a standard, well-bounded delivery.

This is an indicative range, not a quote — real estimates come from a scoping conversation.

Discuss Your Project with CalliArc
Share LinkedIn X

Why it matters

Estimate first, negotiate second

A realistic cost model turns 'how much does an app cost?' into a plan you can budget, compare, and de-risk.

Budget before you commit

Most software projects fail on scope, not code. Knowing the realistic cost band before you approach vendors keeps negotiations grounded.

Compare apples to apples

A structured estimate — hours, phases, team — lets you compare proposals on substance instead of a single mystery number.

Spot the risk early

Aggressive timelines, heavy integrations, and custom AI each change the risk profile. Seeing them named helps you plan mitigations up front.

How it works

From scope to budget in a minute

01

Describe your project

Pick the project type, platform, features, integrations, and team shape. No sign-up needed.

02

Get an instant estimate

The calculator applies the same effort model we use to scope real engagements — live, in your browser.

03

Review the plan

See the cost breakdown by phase, a delivery timeline, the recommended team, and the risk factors.

04

Talk it through

Bring the estimate to a free scoping call — we'll refine it into a real proposal.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How accurate is the estimate?

It's an indicative range, not a quote. The model uses base effort by project type, per-feature hours, and multipliers for platform, UI complexity, roles, and timeline — the same structure we use in real scoping. Actual proposals depend on discovery, so treat the range as a budgeting envelope, typically within ±20% of a scoped estimate.

What hourly rate does the calculator use?

A blended rate of about $38/hour, reflecting CalliArc's offshore-led delivery model with US/EU-facing leads. The same scope at US onshore agency rates ($120–200/hour) would cost 3–5× more.

Why does adding AI features change the cost so much?

AI-assisted features (chatbots, recommendations) build on proven APIs and add modest effort. Advanced AI — custom models, RAG pipelines, agents — adds engineering plus evaluation and iteration cycles that behave more like applied research, so the effort and the risk level both rise.

Is my project data stored anywhere?

No. The calculator runs entirely in your browser — there's no database, no account, and nothing is sent to a server. When you're ready to talk, you choose what to share.

What happens on the scoping call?

A 30-minute conversation about your goals, constraints, and the estimate you built here. You'll leave with a refined range, a suggested engagement model (fixed-scope, dedicated team, or staff augmentation), and a clear next step — no obligation.

Ready to turn the estimate into a plan?

Bring your scope to a free 30-minute call. We'll pressure-test the numbers, suggest the right engagement model, and give you a real proposal — 1200+ projects delivered since 2016.